Alfred Hitchcock and How Sound Ruined Movies

Penguin May 30th, 2008

alfred-hitchcock-and-how-sound-ruined-movies

Found this at Slashfilm. Not sure where they found the quote though, but it’s a great one.

The silent pictures were the purest form of cinema; the only thing they lacked was the sound of people talking and the noises. But this slight imperfection did not warrant the major changes that sound brought in. In Many of the films now being made, there is very little cinema. They are mostly what I call ‘photographs of people talking.’ When we tell a story in cinema, we should resort to dialogue only when it’s impossible to do otherwise. I always try first to tell a story in the cinematic way, through a succession of shots and bits of film in between… To me, one of the cardinal sins for a scriptwriter, when he runs into some difficulty, is to say ‘We can cover that by a line of dialogue.’ Dialogue should simply be a sound among sounds, just something that comes out of the mouths of people whose eyes tell the story in visual terms.

-Penguin

Related posts
alfred-hitchcock-and-how-sound-ruined-movies
  • NinjaVsPenguin
    This is probably because Hitchcock had his foundations in silent and he understood how to use sound. You look at something like Psycho, where the music synced with the knife stabs. It was like perfect.
  • While I love silent movies and all, it's not exactly like his movies in the sound era weren't leaps and bounds better than the silent films he made. He made like one really good silent movie (The Lodger) as opposed to how many classic sound films?
blog comments powered by Disqus